 |
 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
| FAIR-PLAY
Video Festival 2003 have winners! Click here for details |
|
|
PLAY Gallery for Still and Motion Pictures is a gallery and a showroom for art projects based in Berlin focusing on the relationship between film, video and art. The main goal of our gallery is to fascinate and stimulate visitors with new visual languages and narratives that represent an aesthetical and intellectual alternative to the flood of images transmitted by traditional media and advertising. To do it, we invite artists, curators and film-makers to submit proposals aimed specifically at Play space. The organization of workshops - in co-operation with universities and academies - fosters the definition of new ways to analyse contemporary art and the way it is experienced. In this very context, we screen the best Offs coming from festivals and ask experts to provide introductions and comments.
While working on the strategy for this new venture, we knew we would have used a non-traditional approach in showing artists’ projects. The ideas and works we have been exposed to had a strong impact on our thoughts, influencing the way we consider our role and responsibility in the cultural field of our choice.
When we developed the idea of producing a public screening of 19 works by young or emerging international artists dealing with video-art, film and animation, we asked 8 curators and experts we believe have a big relevance in these fields to present us with their choice.
Ellen Pau (HK), Francesco Manacorda (GB), Kathrin Becker (Germany), Leng Lin (China), Michael Darling (USA), Michelle Maccarone (USA), Milovan Farronato (Italy), Ombretta Agro (USA).
Every curator invited different artists to send their most recent video and film work to the gallery. More than fifty artists responded. We screened over 170 videos, starting a process that eventually led us to reconsider our way of evaluating art. We watched all works from the beginning to the end, enjoying the diversity and individuality of all projects. Some documented performative elements while, in others, artists talked about themselves and their work. All had different editing styles and narrative structures. We learned a lot about the impact of sound in general and about the human voice in particular: singing, telling stories or shouting. We learned about the driving force of those emotional moments that can mirror changes at personal, social and environmental level. We learned about the transformation of typography, graphic design and animation in a different context. We witnessed subjective attitudes and highly conceptual approaches. Everything we experienced will be written down and available for visitors.
The most striking sensation was feeling an incessant tension between
us - as viewers - and the artists’ subjective, different
visual languages. After screening so many videos we remembered some while
others vanished from memory. We valued the production of new, original
images rather than the use of found footage, with the exception of those
works where the use of ready-made footage or image-bank material was
appropriate and conceptually consistent. After two month of deep research
we came across 19 artists who stand out in our memory and 19 works we
found of outstanding quality.
The selected artists are: Jón Saemundur Auòrson (Iceland),
Vesna Bukovec (Slovenia), Cacciagrilli (Italy), Nuno Cera (Portugal),
Shahram Entekhabi (Iran), Wu Ershan (China), Jonah Freeman (USA), GUP-py
(Japan), Debora Hirsch (Brasil), Sayaka Kasahara & Kenji Kamoshida
(Japan), Zhao Liang (China), Cecilia Lundqvist (Sweden), Johannes Maier
(Germany), Chiara Pirito (Italy), Margaret Salmon (UK), Matt Saunders
(USA), Nicolàs Serrano (Spain), Stella So (HK), Gina Tornatore
(Australia).
Our research is of course a very subjective and personal one, but we
believe that undertaking projects like this we will develop our own ‘learning
by seeing’ process. Now we can’t wait to see the reaction
of the public and to receive feedback on the selected material.
We wanted to create a festival situation, with a jury that would teach
us - through their arguments, criteria and experience - a
more objective way of defining what ‘excellence’ in art is.
We believe that our work in ‘learning in progress’ and we
think that experts can help us to understand why we like something in
more analytical terms.
Therefore we invited 8 experts we believe are exceptionally experienced
in the field of video-art and film. We wanted a new generation of experts
because we believe in their future and we are sure they will have an
impact on future developments.
We nominated: Ahu Antmen (Turkey), Angelika Richter
(Germany), Charlotte Mailler (Switzerland), Edgar Schmitz (UK), Heike
Munder (Switzerland),
Michael Darling (USA), Moser&Schwinger (Switzerland), Patrick Huber
(Switzerland).
The jury consists of scientists, curators, academics and artists. We
will have no say during the jury meeting, but will be there to listen
and learn. The jury will award a first prize and a second prize. The
first prize will be the a solo exhibition in 2004 at PLAY gallery for
still and motion pictures in Berlin and the publication of a book by Fine
Arts Unternehmen books. The second prize will be a solo exhibition in
2004 at PLAY gallery for still and
motion pictures.
Franco Marinotti and Wolf Guenter Thiel